A defense of retributivism as a theory of punishment. There are three prominent retributive theories that attempt this. Hoffman paul guyer there are deep, insurmountable difficulties with the traditional interpretation of immanuel kant s writings on the subject of punishment. The appeal of retributive justice as a theory of punishment rests in part on direct intuitive support, in part on the claim that it is better than alternative accounts of punishment, and in part on arguments tying it to deeper moral principles. Retributivism is a backwardslooking theory of punishment. Materni abstract since the beginning of recorded history societies have punished offenders while at the same time trying to justify the practice on moral and rational grounds and to clarify the relationship between punishment and justice. It also requires that the response to a crime is proportional to the offence. Most theories seek a punishment proportional to or fitting the crime. Retributive theories of legal punishment fail to justify the imprisonment of convicted offenders. Such theories are classified as mixed theories or hybrid accounts of punishment. Governments apply several theories to support the use of punishment so that the society maintains law and order. The strengths and limits of the theory of retributive. Punishment means, it is the redress that the commonwealth takes against an offending member1punishment is some sort of social.
In this paper, the author will focus on the aspects of retributivist system of punishment. Some retributivists adopt a simple view that punishment of the deserving is normatively justified. Meanwhile, abolitionist theorists argue that we should aim to replace legal punishment rather than to. Theories of deterrence, retribution, just deserts, rehabilitation, and incapacitation as well as the idea of restorative justice will be considered in this chapter. This theory is based on the idea of vindictive justice, or a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye. The retributive or retributivist theory of justice considers punishment as an intrinsically appropriate response to crime. Retributive justice stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. It is an expressive and moralist approach based on the legal principle of just deserts. This article broadens the application of the conjoined twins problem by applying the problem to other versions of retributivism, including deontological, consequentialist, threshold, negativeweak, victimconscious, and mixed retributivist theories. Unlike deterrence theory, an innocent can never be punished. Oct 17, 2014 retributivism is a backwardslooking theory of punishment toby handfield. Private punishment looks more like vengeance than justice 2. Thus, utilitarians take special favor in deterrence, as not only does it lower the overall crime rate, but it often does so by imposing minimal punishment as punishment is an evil in itself. Before we get into the theories of punishment, the following video will provide a basic background in the history of punishment from ancient times through modern america.
Some respond to this point by adopting a mixed theory, according to which retributivism provides a necessary condition for punishment, but. Retributivist theory focusses on punishment to only those who deserve it. According to retributivist theories of punishment, those who break the law should be punished because. Retributive and deterrent theories of punishment youtube. A new reading of kant s theory of punishment robert r. Nov 27, 2018 taking punishment to be the infliction of suffering for an offense, we may say that, traditionally, theories about the justification of punishment have been divided into retributivist and non retributivist, with further subcategories in each category. May 18, 2017 retributivist theories of punishment are in tension with due process. Retributivist theories see punishment as a paying back for the crime committed. The main focus of the article is the retributivist justification.
Pdf analysis of the retributivist theory of punishment. The broad theories of punishment are divided into consequentalist and retributivist theories. One way of doing this is by discouraging wouldbe criminals. Deterrence theories one goal of punishment is to bring about less crime. Pdf retributive punishment and revenge researchgate. Retributivist utalitarian theories justification criminal. Retributivism is a theory of justice that applies to the provision of rewards and. Retributivism and criminal procedure by stephen galoob ssrn. The paper attempts to refute the objection by holding that a wedge can be driven between incapacitation and other reductivist measures, and hints at a possibly new version of dualism in the process. Other purposes, including general deterrence, considerations of equality, and parsimony, provide the necessary fine. Prevention of future crimes deterrence or rehabilitation of the offender are other purposes of punishment. Positive retributivism attempts to offer a more complete account of punishment than negative retributivism which can only operate in combination with a. Taking punishment to be the infliction of suffering for an offense, we may say that, traditionally, theories about the justification of punishment have been divided into retributivist and non retributivist, with further subcategories in each category.
Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies. Punishmentretribution, rehabilitation, and deterrence. Introduction since the dawn of civilization, societies have felt the need to impose order by regulating human relations and interactions according to a set of laws or code of conduct. Radically different answers to this question are offered by consequentialist and by retributivist theorists and by those who seek to incorporate consequentialist and retributivist considerations in mixed theories of punishment. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to. For punishment to be meted out, a person must be found guilty. Public punishment more amenable to justice being carried out theories of punishment retributive, or deserts, theory punishment only when it is deserved not in order to accomplish anything, such as deter. Theories differ in terms of what those results are. Utilitarian justifications for punishment our first theoretical foray into punishment is the utilitarian perspective. The objection also threatens to undermine dualist theories of punishment, theories which combine reductivist and retributivist considerations. The most widespread interpretation amongst contemporary theorists of kants theory of punishment is that it is retributivist. The various forms of retributivist philosophy like payback, annulment will also be discussed.
Reformative theory gives more weight to interest of criminal and deterrent theory priority would be social interest than criminal. Although it is undeniable that throughout his published writings on practical philosophy and in particular in his. The purpose of criminal punishment sage publications inc. A society without punishment would be disorderly because the rate of crimes will be very high. However, this simple retributivism licenses unjust and illegitimate rules of criminal procedure. Utilitarian or retributivist death penalty, the capital punishment, was called by brennan as an official murder because of the main fact that it takes life as a form of providing justice to extreme crimes committed by criminals, an eye for an eye punishment as others may say. Utilitarian and retributivist theories of punishment 1703. Critical analysis of theories of punishment mere denunciation of crime is not enough. Criminal punishment and the pursuit of justice harvard law school. According to the retributive theory the purpose of punishment is to seek revenge. The first article applied the problem of conjoined twins, where one commits a crime and the other is innocent, to pure retributivism. According to hart,7 a retributive theory of punishment involves, at a minimum, three tenets 231. Since they are backwardlooking, they are not concerned with the possibility of a person committing a crime.
By inflecting proportionate punishment to the crime, it considers the interest of wrongdoer and society equal. I also argue that legal retributive punishment is a substitution of. Criminal punishment and the pursuit of justice mike c. In textbooks on punishment one usually finds four major theories or justifi cations of punishment. This paper seeks to critically evaluate the retributivist theory of punishment, making use of jean hamptons writing forgiveness and mercy to make sense of the idea of retribution and to explain it in a way that distinguishes it from. The thesis is that the pervasive role of luck in conditioning behavior problematizes retributivism as a justification of punishment. However, several challenges to a strictly retributivist theory of punishment arise. Each of these theories tries to establish a basis for punishment as a response to the question why punish. True deterrence doctrine, according to the utilitarian philosophy of jeremy bentham, allows for the punishment of innocent individuals if doing so would serve a valuable societal function e. This article challenges the viability of the retributivist justification of punishment, which might be the most commonly accepted theory of justified punishment.
Crimes like rape, theft, kidnapping, robbery, murder among others would be on increase. Retributivist theories conjoined twins problems by brittany. Why retributivism holds that punishment must be deserved. Of the various theories of punishment the following there are the most important and typical retributive, preventive and reformative. Theories of punishment seek to validate the use of punishments and maintain societal order. After setting out some of the canonical sources of the retributivist tradition, and explaining some of the most serious objections to this tradition, it. The strengths and limits of the theory of retributive punishment.
The principle is that if a man has caused the loss of a mans eye, his eye one shall cause to be lost. Retributivist theory emphasizes the need of proportionality of the punishment to the desert. Under retributive justice schemes, it is also important that offenders actually be guilty of the crime for which a penalty has been imposed. Object of punishment is not only punishing the criminal but to prevent the crime in future also. Retributive justice is a theory of punishment that when an offender breaks the law, justice requires that he or she suffer in return. There you have the retributive theory propounded by the prince of modern philosophers. Yet in discussions of the justification of punishment, philosophers persist in talking of retribution and retributive theory as if these labels stood for something. Imposed because of a crime committed not a social good to be achieved.
Backwardlooking theories identify the justification for punishment in some fact about how the tobe punished crime was committed. Deweys rejection of retributivism and his moraleducation. Positive retributivism attempts to offer a more complete account of punishment than negative retributivism which can only operate in combination with a general justification utilitarian or retributivist. This essay looks at recent retributivist theories that draw on denunciation and the expression of moral emotions in order to justify punishment. Deweys rejection of retributivism and his moraleducation theory of punishment john shook this essay examines the two important arguments that john deweys social philosophy offers against the retributivist justi. May 22, 2018 this article expands a previously published article, which introduced a novel problem to the centuriesold debate on the retributivist justification of punishment. The retributive theory of punishment by kurt baier in textbooks on punishment one usually finds four major theories or justifi cations of punishment. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. On the contrary, i will argue there are very different senses in which. It is the theory described in the old testament as an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. The retributivist and utilitarian theories for justification of criminal punishment. Legal punishment stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
Sentencing principles in theory and practice abstract in norval morriss limiting retributivist theory of punishment, considerations of just deserts set upper and occasionally lower limits on sentencing severity. According worldto forwardlooking theories of punishment, punishments are justified to the extent mightthat they bring about future good removingresults. These theories can be divided into two general philosophical camps, retributivism and. Punishment theories of punishment utilitarian, society, theory. Utilitarian and retributivist theories of punishment. The retributivist and utilitarian theories for justification. The advantages and criticisms of this system will be also discussed. A case against the kantian retributivist theory of punishment.
1076 1329 129 1066 201 1295 560 802 963 1115 134 32 472 628 309 157 1290 781 629 1174 435 283 1083 381 1252 361 938 1094 1237 341 483 1117 904 1354 862 590 1018 239 921